PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ABNFX vs. SCHZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ABNFX and SCHZ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.32%
0.61%
ABNFX
SCHZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABNFX:

0.62

SCHZ:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

ABNFX:

0.89

SCHZ:

1.20

Omega Ratio

ABNFX:

1.11

SCHZ:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ABNFX:

0.22

SCHZ:

0.44

Martin Ratio

ABNFX:

1.60

SCHZ:

2.16

Ulcer Index

ABNFX:

2.09%

SCHZ:

2.04%

Daily Std Dev

ABNFX:

5.38%

SCHZ:

5.36%

Max Drawdown

ABNFX:

-19.92%

SCHZ:

-17.16%

Current Drawdown

ABNFX:

-9.58%

SCHZ:

-3.61%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ABNFX having a 1.28% return and SCHZ slightly lower at 1.27%. Over the past 10 years, ABNFX has underperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.29%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively higher 2.39% annualized return.


ABNFX

YTD

1.28%

1M

1.46%

6M

0.32%

1Y

3.62%

5Y*

-0.30%

10Y*

1.29%

SCHZ

YTD

1.27%

1M

1.45%

6M

0.61%

1Y

4.69%

5Y*

0.55%

10Y*

2.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.04% expense ratio.


ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
Expense ratio chart for ABNFX: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%
Expense ratio chart for SCHZ: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABNFX vs. SCHZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABNFX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABNFX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABNFX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABNFX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABNFX is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABNFX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHZ is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHZ is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHZ is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHZ is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHZ is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHZ is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABNFX, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.620.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABNFX, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.891.20
The chart of Omega ratio for ABNFX, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.111.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABNFX, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.220.44
The chart of Martin ratio for ABNFX, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.602.16
ABNFX
SCHZ

The current ABNFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the SCHZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNFX and SCHZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.62
0.81
ABNFX
SCHZ

Dividends

ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison

ABNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than SCHZ's 5.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
4.53%4.56%3.84%2.97%1.68%2.12%2.57%2.66%2.10%1.97%2.23%2.40%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
5.27%5.27%4.64%3.54%3.08%3.24%3.27%4.65%4.01%2.80%3.53%3.21%

Drawdowns

ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNFX drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -17.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNFX and SCHZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.58%
-3.61%
ABNFX
SCHZ

Volatility

ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) have volatilities of 1.43% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.43%
1.41%
ABNFX
SCHZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab