ABNFX vs. SCHZ
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ).
ABNFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 4, 2008. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011.
Performance
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 | -0.55% | 7.42% | 1.42% | 4.29% | -13.08% | -0.88% | 10.86% | 8.08% | 0.15% | 3.48% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNFX achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ABNFX has outperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.95%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.62% annualized return.
ABNFX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.18%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABNFX vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
ABNFX
SCHZ
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABNFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.96 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.79 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 5.11 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABNFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.96 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.04 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.30 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.44 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNFX and SCHZ is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
ABNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than SCHZ's 4.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 | 4.01% | 4.37% | 4.55% | 3.19% | 2.37% | 2.07% | 5.15% | 3.72% | 2.65% | 2.10% | 2.31% | 2.24% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.10% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNFX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNFX and SCHZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -18.74% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.51% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -18.01% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.69% | -18.74% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -2.63% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -3.70% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.88% | +0.15% |
Volatility
ABNFX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) is 1.49%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that ABNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABNFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.66% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.50% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 4.29% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 6.06% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 5.40% | -0.53% |