QDF vs. QARP
QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QDF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDF returned 11.93%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QDF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
QDF vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDF having a 12.96% return and QARP slightly higher at 13.09%.
QDF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 24.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.68%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.48K | $118.49K | $177.11K | |
| $1.70M | $2.15M | $2.21M |
QDF vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 12.96% | 16.58% | 16.95% | 19.71% | -12.13% | 26.65% | 4.86% | 25.71% | -5.86% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 13.09% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDF and QARP is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QDF and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDF vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDF
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
QDF
QARP
Financial Services
QDF
QARP
Healthcare
QDF
QARP
Industrials
QDF
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
QDF
QARP
Consumer Defensive
QDF
QARP
Real Estate
QDF
QARP
Communication Services
QDF
QARP
Utilities
QDF
QARP
Basic Materials
QDF
QARP
Energy
QDF
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDF vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
QDF
QARP
QDF vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDF | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.37 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 15.08 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDF vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDF | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -35.44% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -7.26% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.01% | -15.65% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -22.75% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.14% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -4.37% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.62% | +0.22% |
Volatility
QDF vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.59%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDF | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.59% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 8.16% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 10.71% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 15.52% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 19.51% | -2.14% |
QDF vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDF vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.48% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.29% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDF and QARP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDF has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QDF leads with 11.93% vs 11.83% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDF has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.
QDF has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.
QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDF and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer