QDF vs. MDLV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) and MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. QDF is passively managed, while MDLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDF returned 18.58%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for MDLV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MDLV.

Performance

QDF vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than MDLV's 10.68% return.

QDF

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 8.92%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: 12.35%

MDLV

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 10.68%
• 6M: 10.67%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 13.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDF vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund	9.88%	16.58%	16.95%	16.29%
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	10.68%	13.30%	10.16%	-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QDF and MDLV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2023	0.58

The correlation between QDF and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDF vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDF	MDLV
Technology	39.5%	10.0%
Financial Services	11.5%	14.9%
Healthcare	9.6%	7.8%
Industrials	9.1%	14.6%
Communication Services	7.2%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	8.3%
Real Estate	5.4%	2.3%
Energy	3.4%	14.1%
Utilities	1.8%	14.6%
Basic Materials	0.4%	2.7%

Return for Risk

QDF vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDF

QDF Risk / Return Rank: 72
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MDLV

MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 77
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDF vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDF	MDLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.18	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.14	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.37	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	4.55	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.15	14.09	+0.06

QDF vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDF and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDF vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and MDLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDF	MDLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.67%	-10.71%	-25.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-4.27%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.01%	-10.71%	-7.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-1.44%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-2.27%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.37%	+0.46%

Volatility

QDF vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) at 3.01%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDF	MDLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	3.01%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	6.74%	+2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	8.95%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.66%	10.52%	+5.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.40%	10.52%	+6.88%

QDF vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDF vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than MDLV's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF	2.79%	3.00%	2.78%	2.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund	1.53%	1.65%	1.93%	2.19%	2.45%	1.90%	2.38%	3.05%	4.29%	2.70%	3.07%	3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDF and MDLV in my portfolio?

QDF and MDLV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDF or MDLV?

QDF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to MDLV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

Which ETF is better, QDF or MDLV?

On 3-year performance, QDF leads with 18.58% vs 13.01% for MDLV. On fees, QDF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDF or MDLV?

Over the 3-year period, QDF has performed better with a 18.58% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDF or MDLV?

QDF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDF or MDLV?

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.53% for QDF.

What is the main difference between QDF and MDLV?

They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.58% for MDLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.