QDF vs. DLN
QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - QDF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDF returned 12.35%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
QDF vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDF having a 9.88% return and DLN slightly higher at 9.95%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDF having a 12.35% annualized return and DLN not far ahead at 12.86%.
QDF
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
DLN
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
QDF vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 9.88% | 16.58% | 16.95% | 19.71% | -12.13% | 26.65% | 4.86% | 25.71% | -7.97% | 17.42% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 9.95% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 18.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDF and DLN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QDF and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDF vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDF
DLN
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
QDF
DLN
Financial Services
QDF
DLN
Healthcare
QDF
DLN
Industrials
QDF
DLN
Communication Services
QDF
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
QDF
DLN
Consumer Defensive
QDF
DLN
Real Estate
QDF
DLN
Energy
QDF
DLN
Utilities
QDF
DLN
Basic Materials
QDF
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDF vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
QDF
DLN
QDF vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDF | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.53 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 14.80 | -0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDF vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDF | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -57.84% | +21.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -6.10% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.01% | -13.71% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -16.26% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | -35.82% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -1.12% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -7.50% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.45% | +0.38% |
Volatility
QDF vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDF | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 2.78% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 7.00% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 9.03% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 13.27% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 16.14% | +1.26% |
QDF vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDF vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.53% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.29% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDF and DLN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDF has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 10-year performance, DLN leads with 12.86% vs 12.35% for QDF. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.53% for QDF.
QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDF and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer