QCSTPX vs. SGSCX
QCSTPX (CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2) and SGSCX (DWS Global Small Cap Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, QCSTPX returned 29.73% vs 42.99% for SGSCX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCSTPX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than SGSCX's 20.12% return.
QCSTPX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGSCX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 6M
- 22.38%
- 1Y
- 42.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCSTPX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 | 12.74% | 20.00% | 0.00% |
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 20.12% | 20.22% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCSTPX and SGSCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QCSTPX and SGSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX — Risk / Return Rank
QCSTPX
SGSCX
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCSTPX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.49 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.62 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 17.61 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCSTPX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.88 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.49 | +1.11 |
Drawdowns
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCSTPX drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum SGSCX drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCSTPX and SGSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCSTPX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -62.26% | +45.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -9.54% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -14.12% | +12.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.50% | -0.27% |
Volatility
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) is 3.75%, while DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that QCSTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCSTPX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 5.04% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 11.55% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.87% | 15.31% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 18.88% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 19.53% | -4.32% |
Dividends
QCSTPX vs. SGSCX - Dividend Comparison
QCSTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCSTPX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 8.63% | 10.37% | 6.35% | 5.12% | 5.42% | 16.72% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 18.31% | 11.13% | 7.52% | 6.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCSTPX and SGSCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGSCX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to QCSTPX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCSTPX dropped -16.98% vs SGSCX's -62.26%.
SGSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCSTPX and SGSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer