PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCSTPX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCSTPX achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 20.11% return.


QCSTPX

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.26%
YTD
12.56%
6M
11.88%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GCCHX

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
20.11%
6M
18.32%
1Y
68.36%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCSTPX
CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2
12.56%20.00%0.00%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
20.11%39.25%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QCSTPX and GCCHX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

0.67

The correlation between QCSTPX and GCCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCSTPX
QCSTPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QCSTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCSTPXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

5.81

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

17.68

-4.62

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCSTPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCSTPX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCSTPX drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCSTPX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCSTPXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-54.32%

+37.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-11.76%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-6.77%

+6.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-13.86%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

3.86%

-1.58%

Volatility

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) is 5.35%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that QCSTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCSTPXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

8.79%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

17.71%

-6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

23.85%

-10.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

27.15%

-11.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

25.20%

-9.70%

Dividends

QCSTPX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

QCSTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.25%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%
QCSTPX
CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCSTPX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to QCSTPX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCSTPX dropped -16.98% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCSTPX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer