PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCSTPX vs. SGMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCSTPX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than SGMAX's 8.88% return.


QCSTPX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.39%
YTD
12.74%
6M
13.56%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGMAX

1D
0.41%
1M
2.99%
YTD
8.88%
6M
10.09%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QCSTPX and SGMAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024

0.67

The correlation between QCSTPX and SGMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCSTPX
QCSTPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QCSTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCSTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SGMAX
SGMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SGMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SGMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCSTPXSGMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.85

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

11.20

+2.31

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCSTPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SGMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCSTPX and SGMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCSTPXSGMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.20

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.70

+0.90

Drawdowns

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCSTPX drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum SGMAX drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCSTPX and SGMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCSTPXSGMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-31.27%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-5.88%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-4.81%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.49%

+0.74%

Volatility

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Volatility Comparison

CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SGMAX) at 1.73%. This indicates that QCSTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCSTPXSGMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

1.73%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

5.52%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

7.62%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

13.77%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.22%

+0.99%

Dividends

QCSTPX vs. SGMAX - Dividend Comparison

QCSTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCSTPX
CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGMAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.36%14.55%12.63%6.40%11.12%15.38%2.06%4.81%7.86%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCSTPX and SGMAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCSTPX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to SGMAX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCSTPX dropped -16.98% vs SGMAX's -31.27%.

QCSTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCSTPX and SGMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer