QCMU vs. SPXL
QCMU (Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Over the past year, QCMU returned 3.53% vs 58.26% for SPXL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCMU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
QCMU vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMU achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 27.09% return.
QCMU
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- 6M
- 20.95%
- YTD
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 58.26%
- 3Y*
- 47.56%
- 5Y*
- 20.97%
- 10Y*
- 29.22%
QCMU vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares | -4.41% | 11.21% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 27.09% | 34.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMU and SPXL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between QCMU and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
QCMU vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QCMU
SPXL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QCMU
SPXL
Basic Materials
QCMU
-
SPXL
Communication Services
QCMU
-
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
QCMU
-
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
QCMU
-
SPXL
Energy
QCMU
-
SPXL
Financial Services
QCMU
-
SPXL
Healthcare
QCMU
-
SPXL
Industrials
QCMU
-
SPXL
Real Estate
QCMU
-
SPXL
Utilities
QCMU
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMU vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
QCMU
SPXL
QCMU vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCMU | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.12 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 8.38 | -8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCMU vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMU drawdown since its inception was -59.48%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMU and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMU | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.48% | -76.86% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.48% | -26.77% | -32.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.54% | -2.88% | -44.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -16.07% | -7.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.90% | 6.75% | +24.15% |
Volatility
QCMU vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) has a higher volatility of 41.46% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) at 13.54%. This indicates that QCMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMU | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.46% | 13.54% | +27.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.10% | 29.97% | +62.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.36% | 37.59% | +66.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.58% | 50.57% | +52.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.58% | 53.38% | +49.20% |
QCMU vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMU vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SPXL's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares | 2.61% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.51% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMU and SPXL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCMU has higher volatility (41.46%) compared to SPXL (13.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMU dropped -59.48% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 1-year performance, SPXL leads with 58.26% vs 3.53% for QCMU. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 13.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 58.26% return vs 3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.
QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.51% for SPXL.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QCMU and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCMU and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer