QCMU vs. SPUU
QCMU (Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Over the past year, QCMU returned 3.53% vs 40.22% for SPUU. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCMU charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
QCMU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMU achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.67% return.
QCMU
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- YTD
- 19.67%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 35.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
QCMU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares | -4.41% | 11.21% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 19.67% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMU and SPUU is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between QCMU and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
QCMU vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QCMU
SPUU
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QCMU
SPUU
Basic Materials
QCMU
-
SPUU
Communication Services
QCMU
-
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
QCMU
-
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
QCMU
-
SPUU
Energy
QCMU
-
SPUU
Financial Services
QCMU
-
SPUU
Healthcare
QCMU
-
SPUU
Industrials
QCMU
-
SPUU
Real Estate
QCMU
-
SPUU
Utilities
QCMU
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
QCMU
SPUU
QCMU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCMU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.17 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 8.99 | -8.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCMU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMU drawdown since its inception was -59.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMU and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.48% | -59.35% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.48% | -18.19% | -41.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.54% | -1.40% | -46.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -9.46% | -14.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.90% | 4.38% | +26.52% |
Volatility
QCMU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU) has a higher volatility of 41.46% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 8.62%. This indicates that QCMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.46% | 8.62% | +32.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.10% | 20.06% | +72.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.36% | 25.21% | +79.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.58% | 33.67% | +68.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.58% | 35.74% | +66.84% |
QCMU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMU has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SPUU's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCMU Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares | 2.61% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.31% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMU and SPUU have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCMU has higher volatility (41.46%) compared to SPUU (8.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMU dropped -59.48% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 40.22% vs 3.53% for QCMU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 8.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 40.22% return vs 3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.
QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.31% for SPUU.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QCMU and 0.60% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCMU and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer