QCMD vs. CARD
QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
QCMD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -38.50% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -3.37% return.
QCMD
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -28.50%
- YTD
- -38.50%
- 6M
- -37.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -13.02%
- YTD
- -3.37%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- -37.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCMD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -38.50% | -11.76% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -3.37% | -38.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMD and CARD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
QCMD
CARD
QCMD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCMD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.01 | -0.66 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
QCMD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -93.51% | +37.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.81% | -92.74% | +37.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -68.17% | +54.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 34.04% | — |
Volatility
QCMD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 49.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.28% | 68.57% | -21.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.28% | 80.47% | -33.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.28% | 80.47% | -33.19% |
QCMD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 3.86% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMD and CARD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QCMD.
QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 0.95% for CARD.
Find the right allocation for QCMD and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer