PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLR vs. LRGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCLR vs. LRGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCLR vs. LRGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-6.67%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
-8.67%9.54%26.32%46.36%-31.45%5.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly higher than LRGE's -8.67% return.


QCLR

1D
1.60%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-6.67%
6M
-5.64%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
10Y*

LRGE

1D
3.62%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-8.67%
6M
-9.67%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCLR vs. LRGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCLR vs. LRGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

LRGE
LRGE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LRGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. LRGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLRLRGEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.38

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

0.68

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.09

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.50

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

1.55

+2.78

QCLR vs. LRGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the LRGE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLR and LRGE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLRLRGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.38

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.68

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and LRGE is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QCLR vs. LRGE - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%, more than LRGE's 0.14% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.95%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
0.14%0.13%0.18%0.11%2.02%1.20%0.37%0.37%2.10%0.37%

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. LRGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum LRGE drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and LRGE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLRLRGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-37.03%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-16.32%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-13.29%

+4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-7.25%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

5.25%

-2.75%

Volatility

QCLR vs. LRGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 3.86%, while ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCLRLRGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

7.15%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

13.18%

-4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

20.94%

-8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

20.63%

-8.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

20.68%

-8.07%