QCLR vs. LRGE
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE).
QCLR and LRGE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. LRGE is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 22, 2017.
Performance
QCLR vs. LRGE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QCLR vs. LRGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -6.67% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | -8.67% | 9.54% | 26.32% | 46.36% | -31.45% | 5.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly higher than LRGE's -8.67% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRGE
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -8.67%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QCLR vs. LRGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. LRGE — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
LRGE
QCLR vs. LRGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLR | LRGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.38 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 0.68 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.50 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | 1.55 | +2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLR | LRGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.38 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.68 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and LRGE is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QCLR vs. LRGE - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%, more than LRGE's 0.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.95% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% |
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. LRGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum LRGE drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and LRGE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | LRGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -37.03% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -16.32% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.78% | -13.29% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -7.25% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 5.25% | -2.75% |
Volatility
QCLR vs. LRGE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 3.86%, while ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | LRGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 7.15% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 13.18% | -4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 20.94% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 20.63% | -8.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 20.68% | -8.07% |