QCJL vs. KNG
QCJL (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — QCJL is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. QCJL is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. Over the past year, QCJL returned 20.65% vs 11.15% for KNG. At 0.36, their price movements are largely independent. QCJL charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
QCJL vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCJL achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 2.78% return.
QCJL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- 1Y
- 20.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
QCJL vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July | 2.20% | 13.10% | 4.12% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.78% | 6.63% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCJL and KNG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCJL vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
QCJL
KNG
QCJL vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCJL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.96 | 1.02 | +1.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.54 | 1.58 | +2.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.18 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 1.67 | +3.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.03 | 5.53 | +21.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCJL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 1.02 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.50 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
QCJL vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCJL drawdown since its inception was -11.18%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCJL and KNG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCJL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -35.12% | +23.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.00% | -8.61% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.36% | +5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -4.10% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 2.59% | -1.77% |
Volatility
QCJL vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL) is 3.02%, while FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that QCJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QCJL | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 3.70% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.82% | 7.66% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.04% | 11.08% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 13.65% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 17.29% | -7.46% |
QCJL vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCJL has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCJL vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
QCJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.54% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |