QCGRIX vs. RYGRX
QCGRIX (CREF Growth Account Class R3) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, QCGRIX returned 27.02% vs 37.82% for RYGRX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCGRIX charges 0.21%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.
Performance
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCGRIX achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 30.14% return.
QCGRIX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYGRX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 30.14%
- 6M
- 30.55%
- 1Y
- 37.82%
- 3Y*
- 25.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 9.84% | 14.41% | 0.00% |
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund | 30.14% | 11.00% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCGRIX and RYGRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QCGRIX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank
QCGRIX
RYGRX
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCGRIX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 3.53 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 13.56 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCGRIX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.00 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.44 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and RYGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCGRIX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -54.22% | +30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -11.17% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -9.41% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 2.91% | +2.11% |
Volatility
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) is 3.55%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that QCGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCGRIX | RYGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 6.39% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 16.30% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 19.71% | -3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 23.50% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 22.88% | -2.05% |
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCGRIX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCGRIX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison
QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund | 3.91% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.81% | 4.43% | 12.10% | 7.15% | 6.26% | 0.05% | 2.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCGRIX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYGRX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to QCGRIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGRIX dropped -23.93% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.
RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCGRIX and RYGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer