QCGRIX vs. ACIHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX).

QCGRIX is an actively managed fund by TIAA-CREF. It was launched on Apr 24, 2015. ACIHX is an actively managed fund by American Century. It was launched on Mar 1, 2022.

Performance

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3	-9.56%	14.41%	0.00%
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class	-10.03%	16.26%	-2.08%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QCGRIX having a -9.56% return and ACIHX slightly lower at -10.03%.

QCGRIX

• 1D: 3.91%
• 1M: -5.14%
• YTD: -9.56%
• 6M: -8.71%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACIHX

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: -10.03%
• 6M: -9.48%
• 1Y: 16.46%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGRIX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

QCGRIX

CREF Growth Account Class R3

ACIHX

American Century Growth Fund G Class

Return for Risk

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCGRIX

QCGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 31
QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QCGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QCGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
QCGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QCGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ACIHX

ACIHX Risk / Return Rank: 32
ACIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ACIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ACIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ACIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ACIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCGRIX	ACIHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.78	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.28	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	1.07	-0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.14	3.68	-0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the ACIHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCGRIX and ACIHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCGRIX	ACIHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.78	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.78	-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between QCGRIX and ACIHX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison

QCGRIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.73%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QCGRIX CREF Growth Account Class R3	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class	17.73%	15.95%	5.65%	4.61%	2.86%

Drawdowns

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGRIX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, roughly equal to the maximum ACIHX drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGRIX and ACIHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCGRIX	ACIHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.93%	-24.00%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.69%	-16.40%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.43%	-13.25%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-4.95%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	4.75%	+0.25%

Volatility

QCGRIX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison

CREF Growth Account Class R3 (QCGRIX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) at 6.80%. This indicates that QCGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCGRIX	ACIHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	6.80%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	12.60%	+0.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.69%	22.68%	-1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.46%	21.28%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.46%	21.28%	+0.18%