ACIHX vs. FCNTX
ACIHX (American Century Growth Fund G Class) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, ACIHX returned 23.27%/yr vs 27.03%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACIHX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.
Performance
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACIHX achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.01% return.
ACIHX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 24.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 9.51% | 16.26% | 27.35% | 44.64% | -6.24% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 8.01% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACIHX and FCNTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ACIHX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACIHX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
ACIHX
FCNTX
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACIHX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.83 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.54 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.26 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 9.62 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACIHX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.83 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.78 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACIHX drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIHX and FCNTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACIHX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -49.19% | +25.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -11.30% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -19.75% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -8.16% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 2.65% | +2.22% |
Volatility
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACIHX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.24% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 10.48% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 14.06% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 19.15% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 19.68% | +1.38% |
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACIHX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACIHX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
ACIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIHX American Century Growth Fund G Class | 14.56% | 15.95% | 5.65% | 4.61% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 4.32% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACIHX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACIHX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FCNTX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIHX dropped -24.00% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.
ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACIHX and FCNTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer