QBY vs. HYTI
QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QBY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HYTI.
Performance
QBY vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -34.18% return, which is significantly lower than HYTI's 1.94% return.
QBY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- 6M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -34.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HYTI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $323.62K | $420.33K | $549.23K | |
| $136.73K | $120.85K | $134.30K |
QBY vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF | -34.18% | -8.88% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 1.94% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBY and HYTI is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBY vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank
QBY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYTI
QBY vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBY | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBY vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -41.40%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and HYTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBY | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.40% | -4.47% | -36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.49% | -0.51% | -39.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -0.45% | -27.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility
QBY vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBY | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.94% | 3.81% | +26.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 5.06% | +24.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 5.06% | +24.88% |
QBY vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBY vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison
QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 153.94%, more than HYTI's 10.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 9.57% | 8.10% |
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF | 153.94% | 15.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBY and HYTI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.
QBY has the higher dividend yield at 153.94%, compared with 9.57% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.65% for HYTI.
Find the right allocation for QBY and HYTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer