PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBY vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBY vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBY achieves a -27.51% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 6.83% return.


QBY

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-27.51%
6M
-27.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-1.94%
1M
-12.41%
YTD
6.83%
6M
6.54%
1Y
68.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBY and GOOY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBY vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBY vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBYGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

QBY vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBY vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than GOOY's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBYGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-24.40%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.47%

-14.07%

-20.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.18%

-6.31%

-19.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

Volatility

QBY vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBYGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.49%

23.67%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.49%

23.41%

+8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.49%

23.41%

+8.08%

QBY vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBY vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 119.67%, more than GOOY's 54.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
54.99%41.50%36.74%7.90%
QBY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF
119.67%15.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBY and GOOY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QBY.

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 119.67%, compared with 54.99% for GOOY.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for QBY and 0.99% for GOOY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBY and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer