QBY vs. FIYY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QBY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.

Performance

QBY vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QBY

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: -30.04%
• YTD: -29.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIYY

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBY vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	-3.65%
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF	-1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between QBY and FIYY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	0.33

Return for Risk

QBY vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF (QBY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

QBY vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBY drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBY and FIYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBY	FIYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.93%	-2.51%	-36.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.45%	-2.07%	-34.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.67%	-1.46%	-25.21%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBY	FIYY	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.75%	5.14%	+25.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.75%	5.14%	+25.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.75%	5.14%	+25.61%

QBY vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBY and FIYY have an expense ratio of 1.07%.

Dividends

QBY vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison

QBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.09%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF	1.13%	0.00%
QBY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QBTS ETF	132.09%	15.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBY and FIYY in my portfolio?

QBY and FIYY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBY or FIYY?

Both ETFs have the same 1.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBY or FIYY?

QBY and FIYY have the same expense ratio: 1.07% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBY or FIYY?

QBY has the higher dividend yield at 132.09%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.