QBUL vs. XMAR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) and XMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBUL returned 6.05% vs 13.17% for XMAR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QBUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XMAR.

Performance

QBUL vs. XMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than XMAR's 6.66% return.

QBUL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 6.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMAR

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 13.17%
• 3Y*: 11.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBUL vs. XMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	2.81%	4.87%	0.58%
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	6.66%	10.30%	4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QBUL and XMAR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.57

The correlation between QBUL and XMAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QBUL vs. XMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBUL

QBUL Risk / Return Rank: 47
QBUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QBUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QBUL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QBUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QBUL Martin Ratio Rank: 33

XMAR

XMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
XMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBUL vs. XMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBUL	XMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	4.40	-2.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	7.61	-5.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	2.22	-0.90
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	9.04	-6.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	69.02	-64.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBUL vs. XMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the XMAR Sharpe Ratio of 4.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBUL and XMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBUL	XMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	4.40	-2.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	2.13	-0.98

Drawdowns

QBUL vs. XMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum XMAR drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and XMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBUL	XMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-7.29%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.45%	-1.48%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.15%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-0.30%	-0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	0.19%	+1.05%

Volatility

QBUL vs. XMAR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) at 0.66%. This indicates that QBUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBUL	XMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	0.66%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.23%	2.40%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	3.01%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.78%	5.56%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.78%	5.56%	-1.78%

QBUL vs. XMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBUL vs. XMAR - Dividend Comparison

QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, while XMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF	8.70%	8.94%	1.82%
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBUL and XMAR in my portfolio?

QBUL and XMAR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBUL or XMAR?

QBUL has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to XMAR (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUL dropped -2.45% vs XMAR's -7.29%.

Which ETF is better, QBUL or XMAR?

On 1-year performance, XMAR leads with 13.17% vs 6.05% for QBUL. On fees, QBUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBUL or XMAR?

Over the 1-year period, XMAR has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBUL or XMAR?

QBUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBUL or XMAR?

QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.70%, compared with 0.00% for XMAR.

What is the main difference between QBUL and XMAR?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBUL and 0.85% for XMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.