QBTX vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QBTX returned -32.18% vs 1188.23% for MVLL. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

QBTX vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -33.43% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 932.29% return.

QBTX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 41.52%
• YTD: -33.43%
• 6M: -50.52%
• 1Y: -32.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 9.51%
• 1M: 210.19%
• YTD: 932.29%
• 6M: 650.49%
• 1Y: 1,188.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	-33.43%	318.19%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	932.29%	49.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and MVLL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

QBTX vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX

QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBTX	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	9.04	-9.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	4.76	-3.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.63	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	24.55	-24.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	51.11	-51.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBTX vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTX	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	9.04	-9.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	3.62	-2.98

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTX	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.48%	-59.02%	-36.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.48%	-48.93%	-46.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.63%	0.00%	-84.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.16%	-22.35%	-33.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.22%	23.46%	+43.76%

Volatility

QBTX vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 77.26% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) at 60.89%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTX	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	77.26%	60.89%	+16.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	148.86%	96.34%	+52.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	214.74%	133.35%	+81.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	241.54%	139.62%	+101.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	241.54%	139.62%	+101.92%

QBTX vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBTX vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.82%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	19.82%	13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTX and MVLL in my portfolio?

QBTX and MVLL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBTX or MVLL?

QBTX has higher volatility (77.26%) compared to MVLL (60.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTX dropped -95.48% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, QBTX or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1188.23% vs -32.18% for QBTX. On fees, QBTX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, MVLL has been the lower-risk option at 60.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBTX or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1188.23% return vs -32.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBTX or MVLL?

QBTX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBTX or MVLL?

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 19.82%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

What is the main difference between QBTX and MVLL?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.04 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.