PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTX vs. HCAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QBTX is traded in USD, while HCAL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HCAL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTX achieves a -49.88% return, which is significantly lower than HCAL.TO's 33.76% return.


QBTX

1D
4.15%
1M
-34.95%
YTD
-49.88%
6M
-60.48%
1Y
-24.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HCAL.TO

1D
0.60%
1M
7.32%
YTD
33.76%
6M
34.09%
1Y
90.06%
3Y*
43.05%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
-49.88%339.28%
HCAL.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF
33.76%64.53%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTX and HCAL.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTX
QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HCAL.TO
HCAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HCAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HCAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTXHCAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.94

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

7.60

-7.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

34.06

-34.41

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the HCAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTX and HCAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTX drawdown since its inception was -95.48%, which is greater than HCAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTX and HCAL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTXHCAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.48%

-40.80%

-54.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.48%

-11.92%

-83.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.42%

0.00%

-88.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.31%

-12.21%

-45.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.22%

2.65%

+66.57%

Volatility

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a higher volatility of 66.40% compared to Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) at 4.75%. This indicates that QBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTXHCAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.40%

4.75%

+61.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

150.11%

14.24%

+135.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

217.47%

16.50%

+200.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

241.06%

18.53%

+222.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

241.06%

18.35%

+222.71%

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HCAL.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTX vs. HCAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.33%, more than HCAL.TO's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HCAL.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF
3.12%4.20%6.12%7.37%7.46%4.99%3.14%
QBTX
Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF
26.33%13.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTX and HCAL.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HCAL.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HCAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

QBTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HCAL.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QBTX and 0.65% for HCAL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTX and HCAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer