PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTS vs. UAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QBTS vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 40.24% return.


QBTS

1D
-1.89%
1M
9.00%
YTD
-10.63%
6M
-10.46%
1Y
47.17%
3Y*
123.62%
5Y*
10Y*

UAMY

1D
-3.96%
1M
-29.39%
YTD
40.24%
6M
25.71%
1Y
133.11%
3Y*
174.60%
5Y*
49.67%
10Y*
39.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTS vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc
-10.63%211.31%854.44%-38.88%-83.96%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
40.24%183.62%610.84%-48.86%-2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTS and UAMY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022

0.24

The correlation between QBTS and UAMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QBTS:

$8.59B

UAMY:

$996.95M

EPS

QBTS:

-$1.08

UAMY:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

QBTS:

637.12

UAMY:

23.26

PB Ratio

QBTS:

7.64

UAMY:

7.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

QBTS:

$12.44M

UAMY:

$39.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

QBTS:

$8.25M

UAMY:

$4.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

QBTS:

-$399.03M

UAMY:

-$15.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTS vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTS
QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTS vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBTSUAMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.80

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

3.10

-1.93

QBTS vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTS and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBTS vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, roughly equal to the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and UAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTSUAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.67%

-96.44%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.01%

-74.30%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.17%

-74.30%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.81%

-59.70%

+11.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.66%

-66.41%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.64%

43.23%

-2.59%

Volatility

QBTS vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) at 30.55%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTSUAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.66%

30.55%

+12.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.89%

93.03%

-16.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.46%

132.02%

-23.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.99%

95.07%

+55.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.99%

101.02%

+49.97%

Dividends

QBTS vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTS nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QBTS vs. UAMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between D-Wave Quantum Inc and United States Antimony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20222023202420252026
2.86M
6.78M
(QBTS) Total Revenue
(UAMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTS and UAMY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to UAMY (30.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTS and UAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer