QBIG vs. SPUC
QBIG (Invesco Top QQQ ETF) and SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBIG returned 35.93% vs 29.32% for SPUC. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBIG charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for SPUC.
Performance
QBIG vs. SPUC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than SPUC's 9.32% return.
QBIG
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QBIG vs. SPUC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF | 8.80% | 21.46% | 3.04% |
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.32% | 22.64% | -9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBIG and SPUC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QBIG and SPUC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
QBIG vs. SPUC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QBIG
SPUC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QBIG
SPUC
Financial Services
QBIG
SPUC
Consumer Cyclical
QBIG
SPUC
Communication Services
QBIG
SPUC
Basic Materials
QBIG
-
SPUC
Consumer Defensive
QBIG
-
SPUC
Energy
QBIG
-
SPUC
Healthcare
QBIG
-
SPUC
Industrials
QBIG
-
SPUC
Real Estate
QBIG
-
SPUC
Utilities
QBIG
-
SPUC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBIG vs. SPUC — Risk / Return Rank
QBIG
SPUC
QBIG vs. SPUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBIG | SPUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.55 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 8.60 | -2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBIG | SPUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.75 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.76 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
QBIG vs. SPUC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, roughly equal to the maximum SPUC drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and SPUC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBIG | SPUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.33% | -29.20% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.70% | -11.56% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.42% | -2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -8.48% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 3.42% | +2.87% |
Volatility
QBIG vs. SPUC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) at 2.71%. This indicates that QBIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBIG | SPUC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 2.71% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 10.88% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 16.84% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 21.95% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 21.46% | +5.86% |
QBIG vs. SPUC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUC's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBIG vs. SPUC - Dividend Comparison
QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.19% | 7.70% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.53% | 2.00% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBIG and SPUC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBIG has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to SPUC (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBIG dropped -30.33% vs SPUC's -29.20%.
On 1-year performance, QBIG leads with 35.93% vs 29.32% for SPUC. On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPUC has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QBIG has performed better with a 35.93% return vs 29.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPUC.
SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 9.19%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.53% for SPUC.
QBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBIG and SPUC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer