PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBIG vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBIG vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.


QBIG

1D
0.06%
1M
3.57%
YTD
8.86%
6M
6.25%
1Y
35.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBIG vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and BUFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBIG vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG
QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBIGBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

QBIG vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBIGBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

2.68

-1.83

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBIGBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.33%

-2.87%

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.07%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-0.24%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

Volatility

QBIG vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBIGBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

3.98%

+15.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.28%

3.98%

+23.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.28%

3.98%

+23.30%

QBIG vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBIG vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBIG nor BUFX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QBIG and BUFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

QBIG and BUFX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QBIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBIG and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer