QBIG vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QBIG (Invesco Top QQQ ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBIG returned 20.54% vs 10.74% for BDGS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QBIG charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

QBIG vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBIG achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 3.92% return.

QBIG

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -9.29%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: 20.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 6M: 3.55%
• 1Y: 10.74%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBIG vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF	-0.95%	21.46%	3.04%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	3.92%	10.61%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QBIG and BDGS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.87

The correlation between QBIG and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QBIG vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QBIG	BDGS
Technology	22.9%	37.4%
Financial Services	10.5%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	10.9%
Communication Services	6.7%	16.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%
Energy	-	2.6%
Healthcare	-	7.5%
Industrials	-	6.6%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

QBIG vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBIG

QBIG Risk / Return Rank: 27
QBIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
QBIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
QBIG Omega Ratio Rank: 28
QBIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
QBIG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBIG vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBIG	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.70	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.55	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.34	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.05	2.68	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	11.59	-8.47

QBIG vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBIG and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBIG vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBIG drawdown since its inception was -30.33%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBIG and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBIG	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.33%	-9.12%	-21.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.70%	-4.03%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.00%	-2.44%	-9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.05%	-0.66%	-6.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	0.93%	+5.68%

Volatility

QBIG vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.30%. This indicates that QBIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBIG	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.27%	2.30%	+4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.61%	5.18%	+10.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.41%	6.35%	+14.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.39%	8.22%	+19.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.39%	8.22%	+19.17%

QBIG vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBIG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBIG vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

QBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
QBIG Invesco Top QQQ ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBIG and BDGS in my portfolio?

QBIG and BDGS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBIG or BDGS?

QBIG has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to BDGS (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBIG dropped -30.33% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, QBIG or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, QBIG leads with 20.54% vs 10.74% for BDGS. On fees, QBIG is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QBIG or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, QBIG has performed better with a 20.54% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBIG or BDGS?

QBIG is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBIG or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for QBIG.

What is the main difference between QBIG and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QBIG and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.