QBF vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QBF charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

QBF vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBF achieves a -27.01% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 94.41% return.

QBF

• 1D: -3.18%
• 1M: -14.78%
• YTD: -27.01%
• 6M: -27.39%
• 1Y: -37.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBF vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-27.01%	-4.15%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between QBF and CIFU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

QBF vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBF

QBF Risk / Return Rank: 1
QBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
QBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBF vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBF	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	—	—

Drawdowns

QBF vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBF drawdown since its inception was -46.35%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBF and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBF	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.35%	-77.20%	+30.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.44%	-10.48%	-34.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.82%	-42.93%	+25.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBF	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.20%	207.07%	-179.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.01%	207.07%	-178.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.01%	207.07%	-178.06%

QBF vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBF vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	1.89%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBF and CIFU in my portfolio?

QBF and CIFU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBF or CIFU?

On fees, QBF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBF or CIFU?

QBF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBF or CIFU?

QBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between QBF and CIFU?

QBF is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 1.50% for CIFU.