QBER vs. XUSP
QBER (TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF) and XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QBER returned -0.85% vs 33.74% for XUSP. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
QBER vs. XUSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than XUSP's 12.67% return.
QBER
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- -0.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUSP
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBER vs. XUSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | -0.96% | 0.25% | 0.04% |
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 12.67% | 18.27% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBER and XUSP is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | -0.51 |
The correlation between QBER and XUSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.48 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBER vs. XUSP — Risk / Return Rank
QBER
XUSP
QBER vs. XUSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBER | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 2.80 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 11.82 | -12.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBER | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 2.13 | -2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 1.04 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
QBER vs. XUSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum XUSP drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and XUSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBER | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -22.59% | +16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -12.13% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -0.86% | -4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -4.42% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 2.86% | -1.89% |
Volatility
QBER vs. XUSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is 0.87%, while Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that QBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBER | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 4.13% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 11.89% | -9.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 15.90% | -12.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 19.21% | -12.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 19.21% | -12.81% |
QBER vs. XUSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QBER and XUSP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
QBER vs. XUSP - Dividend Comparison
QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while XUSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | 3.29% | 3.26% | 1.35% |
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBER and XUSP have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XUSP has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to QBER (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs XUSP's -22.59%.
On 1-year performance, XUSP leads with 33.74% vs -0.85% for QBER. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 33.74% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBER and XUSP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
QBER has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for XUSP.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.
XUSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBER and XUSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer