PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBDSX vs. QSTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBDSX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than QSTFX's 18.77% return. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX has underperformed QSTFX with an annualized return of 0.81%, while QSTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.25%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
0.81%

QSTFX

1D
0.05%
1M
5.15%
YTD
18.77%
6M
13.48%
1Y
49.61%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.25%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
18.77%-2.48%29.94%61.87%-46.15%28.79%78.20%16.43%-6.86%68.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QBDSX and QSTFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2015

0.33

The correlation between QBDSX and QSTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBDSX vs. QSTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QSTFX
QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QBDSXQSTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

2.65

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

6.77

-4.84

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the QSTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBDSX and QSTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBDSXQSTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.87

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.43

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.64

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.57

-0.41

Drawdowns

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBDSX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum QSTFX drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBDSX and QSTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBDSXQSTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-49.03%

+30.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-17.87%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-32.22%

+28.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.40%

-49.03%

+41.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.38%

-49.03%

+30.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-0.11%

-7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-15.48%

+8.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

6.97%

-5.86%

Volatility

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) is 0.64%, while Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that QBDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBDSXQSTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

5.75%

-5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

18.74%

-16.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

25.33%

-21.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

27.06%

-22.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

27.88%

-22.63%

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBDSX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than QSTFX's 1.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBDSX vs. QSTFX - Dividend Comparison

QBDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than QSTFX's 8.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.46%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
8.97%10.65%5.12%1.03%0.00%21.93%20.82%0.52%2.57%39.11%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBDSX and QSTFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSTFX has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to QBDSX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBDSX dropped -18.38% vs QSTFX's -49.03%.

QSTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBDSX and QSTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer