QBDSX vs. ETIMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) and ETIMX (Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX returned 0.76%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for ETIMX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QBDSX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for ETIMX.

Performance

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund (ETIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBDSX achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than ETIMX's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, QBDSX has underperformed ETIMX with an annualized return of 0.76%, while ETIMX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.

QBDSX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: -1.06%
• 1Y: 0.51%
• 3Y*: 2.69%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 0.76%

ETIMX

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 9.72%
• 1Y: 13.57%
• 3Y*: 12.25%
• 5Y*: 5.86%
• 10Y*: 8.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	-0.38%	5.11%	1.02%	2.25%	-4.09%	-0.66%	-9.22%	10.50%	-3.17%	5.05%
ETIMX Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund	10.46%	6.95%	9.79%	12.16%	-15.28%	16.26%	18.42%	19.88%	-8.16%	11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QBDSX and ETIMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.52

The correlation between QBDSX and ETIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (5 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QBDSX vs. ETIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBDSX

QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 5
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ETIMX

ETIMX Risk / Return Rank: 49
ETIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ETIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ETIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ETIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ETIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) and Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund (ETIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QBDSX	ETIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	1.68	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	2.35	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.30	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	3.00	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	10.58	-9.86

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the ETIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBDSX and ETIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBDSX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum ETIMX drawdown of -22.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBDSX and ETIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBDSX	ETIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-22.79%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-4.81%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.76%	-11.14%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.40%	-20.58%	+13.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.38%	-22.79%	+4.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.41%	-1.08%	-7.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.85%	-4.15%	-2.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.36%	-0.14%

Volatility

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) is 0.83%, while Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund (ETIMX) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that QBDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBDSX	ETIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	3.52%	-2.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.43%	7.07%	-4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	8.61%	-4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.31%	9.82%	-5.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	10.11%	-4.85%

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBDSX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ETIMX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

QBDSX vs. ETIMX - Dividend Comparison

QBDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than ETIMX's 5.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETIMX Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund	5.88%	6.38%	1.86%	1.63%	2.95%	5.86%	2.00%	2.90%	4.29%	4.40%	2.66%	0.00%
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund	4.49%	4.47%	3.98%	4.51%	0.54%	0.71%	0.87%	2.26%	2.04%	2.51%	1.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBDSX and ETIMX in my portfolio?

QBDSX and ETIMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QBDSX or ETIMX?

ETIMX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to QBDSX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBDSX dropped -18.38% vs ETIMX's -22.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.