QB vs. TMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds - QB tracks the Nasdaq-100 while TMAR tracks the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TMAR.

Performance

QB vs. TMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QB achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than TMAR's 14.45% return.

QB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMAR

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 6M: 15.92%
• 1Y: 28.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QB vs. TMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	10.47%	5.77%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	14.45%	8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between QB and TMAR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

QB vs. TMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAR

TMAR Risk / Return Rank: 94
TMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
TMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
TMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QB vs. TMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QB	TMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.17	2.25	+0.92

Drawdowns

QB vs. TMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QB drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum TMAR drawdown of -9.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QB and TMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QB	TMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-9.93%	+8.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.72%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-0.66%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QB	TMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.75%	9.47%	-3.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.75%	11.42%	-5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.75%	11.42%	-5.67%

QB vs. TMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QB vs. TMAR - Dividend Comparison

QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while TMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.62%	0.48%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QB and TMAR in my portfolio?

QB and TMAR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QB or TMAR?

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QB or TMAR?

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QB or TMAR?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for TMAR.

What is the main difference between QB and TMAR?

QB tracks Nasdaq-100, while TMAR tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QB and 0.95% for TMAR.