PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QAT vs. EMIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QAT vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than EMIF's 3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, QAT has outperformed EMIF with an annualized return of 4.34%, while EMIF has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.


QAT

1D
-1.37%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
1.39%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
4.34%

EMIF

1D
1.45%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
3.33%
6M
2.75%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QAT vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
-0.05%8.81%5.20%2.72%-7.23%14.42%6.94%-0.44%20.03%-11.66%
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
3.33%33.90%1.21%5.67%-12.59%3.76%-19.98%16.36%-13.70%20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QAT and EMIF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.28

QAT vs. EMIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QAT
EMIF

Financial Services

54.3%

-

Industrials

13.2%
41.1%

Basic Materials

12.7%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Real Estate

3.9%

-

Energy

3.3%
18.8%

Utilities

2.6%
40.1%

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.7%

-

Technology

0.5%

-

Financial Services

QAT
54.3%
EMIF

-

Industrials

QAT
13.2%
EMIF
41.1%

Basic Materials

QAT
12.7%
EMIF

-

Communication Services

QAT
6.7%
EMIF

-

Real Estate

QAT
3.9%
EMIF

-

Energy

QAT
3.3%
EMIF
18.8%

Utilities

QAT
2.6%
EMIF
40.1%

Healthcare

QAT
0.8%
EMIF

-

Consumer Cyclical

QAT
0.7%
EMIF

-

Consumer Defensive

QAT
0.7%
EMIF

-

Technology

QAT
0.5%
EMIF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QAT vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIF
EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QAT vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QATEMIFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

1.58

-1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

2.25

-1.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.29

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.96

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.73

5.70

-4.98

QAT vs. EMIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the EMIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAT and EMIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QATEMIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

1.58

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.27

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.12

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.17

-0.11

Drawdowns

QAT vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, smaller than the maximum EMIF drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and EMIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QATEMIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.21%

-48.02%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-12.35%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-16.70%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.17%

-23.68%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-48.02%

+13.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.48%

-11.08%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.18%

-15.91%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

4.24%

+1.28%

Volatility

QAT vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) at 4.19%. This indicates that QAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QATEMIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

4.19%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

12.87%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

15.32%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

19.66%

-4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

20.61%

-3.05%

QAT vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QAT vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison

QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than EMIF's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
4.80%4.96%4.12%2.64%3.08%3.94%2.54%2.07%2.64%2.58%3.16%2.07%
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
3.51%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


QAT and EMIF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QAT has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to EMIF (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAT dropped -45.21% vs EMIF's -48.02%.

On 10-year performance, QAT leads with 4.34% vs 2.52% for EMIF. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EMIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QAT has performed better with a 4.34% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMIF.

EMIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 3.51% for QAT.

QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index, while EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for QAT and 0.75% for EMIF.

EMIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QAT and EMIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer