QARP vs. URTH
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while URTH is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 12.06%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for URTH. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for URTH.
Performance
QARP vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QARP having a 10.34% return and URTH slightly lower at 10.16%.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
URTH
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
QARP vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 10.16% | 21.36% | 18.66% | 23.95% | -17.97% | 22.27% | 15.78% | 28.15% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and URTH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QARP and URTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
QARP vs. URTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
URTH
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
QARP
URTH
Communication Services
QARP
URTH
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
URTH
Healthcare
QARP
URTH
Consumer Defensive
QARP
URTH
Financial Services
QARP
URTH
Industrials
QARP
URTH
Energy
QARP
URTH
Basic Materials
QARP
URTH
Real Estate
QARP
URTH
Utilities
QARP
URTH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
URTH
QARP vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.89 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 13.11 | +2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.17 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.74 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.73 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum URTH drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and URTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -34.01% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -9.06% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -16.94% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -26.05% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.74% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -4.37% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.99% | -0.40% |
Volatility
QARP vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.21%, while iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 3.27% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 9.42% | -1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 12.05% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.19% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.27% | +2.38% |
QARP vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QARP vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than URTH's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.35% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and URTH have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URTH has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to QARP (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs URTH's -34.01%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.06% vs 11.86% for URTH. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for URTH.
URTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.
QARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while URTH is Global Equities. QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.24% for URTH.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and URTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer