QARP vs. SPIT
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QARP is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
QARP vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.30% return.
QARP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 18.89%
- YTD
- 27.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.11% | 3.49% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 27.30% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and SPIT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QARP vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QARP | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QARP vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -12.49% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.43% | +5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -2.51% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | — | — |
Volatility
QARP vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 26.39% | -15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 26.39% | -10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 26.39% | -6.83% |
QARP vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
QARP vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPIT's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.64% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and SPIT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for QARP and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer