QARP vs. SGRT
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QARP is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
QARP vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 25.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 10.34% | 7.04% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and SGRT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
SGRT
QARP vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QARP | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QARP | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 3.81 | -3.09 |
Drawdowns
QARP vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -17.87% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -3.11% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | — | — |
Volatility
QARP vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 33.41% | -23.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 33.41% | -17.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 33.41% | -13.76% |
QARP vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
QARP vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and SGRT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for QARP and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer