QARP vs. GQQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, QARP returned 23.23% vs 36.19% for GQQQ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GQQQ.

Performance

QARP vs. GQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than GQQQ's 18.47% return.

QARP

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 23.23%
• 3Y*: 17.59%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: —

GQQQ

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 18.47%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QARP vs. GQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	9.07%	13.99%	0.74%
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	18.47%	17.37%	1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QARP and GQQQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.81

The correlation between QARP and GQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QARP vs. GQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 73
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 79

GQQQ

GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QARP vs. GQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QARP	GQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.12	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.79	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.37	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	3.30	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.41	14.21	+0.20

QARP vs. GQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the GQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QARP and GQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QARP vs. GQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than GQQQ's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and GQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QARP	GQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-22.36%	-13.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-11.02%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-2.93%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-3.10%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	2.55%	-0.93%

Volatility

QARP vs. GQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 3.65%, while Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QARP	GQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	7.88%	-4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	14.18%	-5.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.71%	17.21%	-6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	20.71%	-5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	20.71%	-1.09%

QARP vs. GQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GQQQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QARP vs. GQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than GQQQ's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	0.41%	0.46%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.05%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QARP and GQQQ in my portfolio?

QARP and GQQQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QARP or GQQQ?

GQQQ has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to QARP (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs GQQQ's -22.36%.

Which ETF is better, QARP or GQQQ?

On 1-year performance, GQQQ leads with 36.19% vs 23.23% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QARP or GQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, GQQQ has performed better with a 36.19% return vs 23.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QARP or GQQQ?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QARP or GQQQ?

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.41% for GQQQ.

What is the main difference between QARP and GQQQ?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.35% for GQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.