QARP vs. DGRO
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 11.74%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
QARP vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QARP having a 12.11% return and DGRO slightly higher at 12.23%.
QARP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 21.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
QARP vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.11% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 12.23% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and DGRO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QARP and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QARP vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
DGRO
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
QARP
DGRO
Healthcare
QARP
DGRO
Financial Services
QARP
DGRO
Communication Services
QARP
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
QARP
DGRO
Industrials
QARP
DGRO
Energy
QARP
DGRO
Basic Materials
QARP
DGRO
Utilities
QARP
DGRO
Real Estate
QARP
DGRO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
DGRO
QARP vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QARP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.36 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 12.98 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QARP vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -35.10% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -6.47% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -14.03% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -19.31% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.50% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -3.42% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.67% | -0.04% |
Volatility
QARP vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.52%. This indicates that QARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 2.52% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 6.94% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | 9.50% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 13.79% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 16.57% | +2.99% |
QARP vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QARP vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than DGRO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.91% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and DGRO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QARP has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to DGRO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 11.74% vs 11.06% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.03% for QARP.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer