QARP vs. ACGR
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while ACGR tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QARP returned 11.76%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for ACGR. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACGR.
Performance
QARP vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than ACGR's 2.14% return.
QARP
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ACGR
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 9.07% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 11.52% |
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 2.14% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and ACGR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between QARP and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
ACGR
QARP vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QARP | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.19 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 1.10 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.41 | 3.64 | +10.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QARP vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum ACGR drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and ACGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -34.54% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -15.84% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | -24.58% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -34.54% | +11.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -6.48% | +4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -8.46% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 4.79% | -3.17% |
Volatility
QARP vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 3.65%, while American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | ACGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 5.97% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 12.78% | -4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 16.19% | -5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 21.64% | -6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 21.43% | -1.81% |
QARP vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QARP vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than ACGR's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and ACGR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACGR has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to QARP (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs ACGR's -34.54%.
On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 13.01% vs 11.76% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 11.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACGR.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.16% for ACGR.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.39% for ACGR.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and ACGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer