QALT vs. APMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and APMU (ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while APMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by ActivePassive. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for APMU.

Performance

QALT vs. APMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than APMU's 0.44% return.

QALT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APMU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALT vs. APMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	6.22%	4.91%
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	0.44%	1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QALT and APMU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

QALT vs. APMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APMU

APMU Risk / Return Rank: 49
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALT vs. APMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QALT	APMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.98	0.82	+1.17

Drawdowns

QALT vs. APMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, which is greater than APMU's maximum drawdown of -4.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and APMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALT	APMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-4.39%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-1.17%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-0.93%	-0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QALT	APMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.63%	2.37%	+5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	2.81%	+4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.63%	2.81%	+4.82%

QALT vs. APMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than APMU's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALT vs. APMU - Dividend Comparison

QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than APMU's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	2.66%	2.63%	2.42%	1.31%
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	5.46%	5.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALT and APMU in my portfolio?

QALT and APMU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QALT or APMU?

On fees, APMU is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QALT or APMU?

APMU is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QALT or APMU?

QALT has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.66% for APMU.

What is the main difference between QALT and APMU?

QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while APMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SEI and ActivePassive. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.36% for APMU.