PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QALT vs. FARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QALT vs. FARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than FARX's 7.40% return.


QALT

1D
-0.82%
1M
1.16%
YTD
6.57%
6M
6.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FARX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
7.40%
6M
6.75%
1Y
16.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALT vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QALT and FARX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QALT vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QALT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FARX
FARX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALT vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QALTFARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.41

QALT vs. FARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QALT vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum FARX drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and FARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QALTFARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-5.83%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.30%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-1.05%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

Volatility

QALT vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QALTFARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.86%

7.28%

+44.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.86%

7.04%

+44.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.86%

7.04%

+44.82%

QALT vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FARX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

QALT vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison

QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than FARX's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
2.95%3.25%0.19%
QALT
SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
5.44%5.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QALT and FARX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QALT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QALT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FARX.

QALT has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 2.95% for FARX.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 1.00% for FARX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QALT and FARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer