APMU vs. APCB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB).

APMU and APCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. APMU is an actively managed fund by ActivePassive. It was launched on May 2, 2023. APCB is an actively managed fund by ActivePassive. It was launched on May 2, 2023.

Performance

APMU vs. APCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APMU vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	-0.44%	4.50%	0.86%	1.24%
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	-0.22%	6.87%	1.45%	1.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APMU achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than APCB's -0.22% return.

APMU

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 3.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APCB

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APMU vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APMU and APCB have an expense ratio of 0.36%.

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

APCB

ActivePassive Core Bond ETF

Return for Risk

APMU vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APMU

APMU Risk / Return Rank: 61
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 71
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 51

APCB

APCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 48
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APMU vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APMU	APCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.05	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	1.47	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.19	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	1.70	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	5.23	-0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APMU vs. APCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the APCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APMU and APCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APMU	APCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.05	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.67	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between APMU and APCB is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

APMU vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison

APMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than APCB's 4.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	2.62%	2.63%	2.42%	1.31%
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	4.32%	4.35%	4.74%	2.22%

Drawdowns

APMU vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APMU drawdown since its inception was -4.39%, smaller than the maximum APCB drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APMU and APCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	APMU	APCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-6.42%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.40%	-2.51%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-1.91%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-1.51%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	0.82%	-0.08%

Volatility

APMU vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) is 1.06%, while ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that APMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APMU	APCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	1.48%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	2.32%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93%	3.90%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.83%	4.91%	-2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.83%	4.91%	-2.08%