QALT vs. SEIV
QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.
Performance
QALT vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 16.08% return.
QALT
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEIV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 25.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QALT vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 7.45% | 53.86% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 16.08% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QALT and SEIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QALT vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank
QALT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEIV
QALT vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QALT | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QALT vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and SEIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QALT | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -18.18% | +13.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.70% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -3.47% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
QALT vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QALT | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.97% | 12.79% | +39.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.97% | 16.69% | +35.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.97% | 16.69% | +35.28% |
QALT vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QALT vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison
QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than SEIV's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF | 5.39% | 5.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QALT and SEIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.
QALT has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 1.37% for SEIV.
QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while SEIV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.15% for SEIV.
Find the right allocation for QALT and SEIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer