QALT vs. SEIV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.

Performance

QALT vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 20.90% return.

QALT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 4.02%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SEIV

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 4.15%
• 6M: 17.50%
• YTD: 20.90%
• 1Y: 42.78%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	$646.82K	$495.56K	$313.10K
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	$9.14M	$9.18M	$6.19M

QALT vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	6.99%	53.86%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	20.90%	10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QALT and SEIV is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

QALT vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QALT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 96
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QALT vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QALT	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.61	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	22.94	—

Drawdowns

QALT vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and SEIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALT	SEIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-18.18%	+13.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.95%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	0.00%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-3.42%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QALT	SEIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.73%	12.76%	+35.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.73%	16.54%	+32.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.73%	16.54%	+32.19%

QALT vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALT vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than SEIV's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	6.02%	5.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	1.43%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALT and SEIV in my portfolio?

QALT and SEIV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QALT or SEIV?

On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QALT or SEIV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QALT or SEIV?

QALT has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 1.43% for SEIV.

What is the main difference between QALT and SEIV?

QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while SEIV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.15% for SEIV.