QALT vs. AFIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QALT (SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF) and AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QALT is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by SEI, while AFIF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QALT charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for AFIF.

Performance

QALT vs. AFIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than AFIF's 1.38% return.

QALT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFIF

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.38%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 3.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALT vs. AFIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	6.22%	4.91%
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	1.38%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QALT and AFIF is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

QALT vs. AFIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIF

AFIF Risk / Return Rank: 63
AFIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AFIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
AFIF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
AFIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AFIF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALT vs. AFIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QALT	AFIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.98	0.42	+1.56

Drawdowns

QALT vs. AFIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, smaller than the maximum AFIF drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and AFIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALT	AFIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-10.29%	+5.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.63%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.11%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-2.23%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QALT	AFIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.63%	2.76%	+4.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	4.44%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.63%	6.27%	+1.36%

QALT vs. AFIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AFIF's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALT vs. AFIF - Dividend Comparison

QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than AFIF's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	3.58%	3.52%	5.61%	5.91%	3.49%	1.73%	1.25%	2.54%	0.69%
QALT SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF	5.46%	5.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALT and AFIF in my portfolio?

QALT and AFIF have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QALT or AFIF?

On fees, QALT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QALT or AFIF?

QALT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QALT or AFIF?

QALT has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 3.58% for AFIF.

What is the main difference between QALT and AFIF?

QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while AFIF is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 1.08% for AFIF.