AFIF vs. GBF
AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) and GBF (iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFIF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while GBF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. AFIF is actively managed, while GBF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFIF returned 3.68%/yr vs -0.27%/yr for GBF. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFIF charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GBF.
Performance
AFIF vs. GBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFIF achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than GBF's 0.45% return.
AFIF
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
GBF
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
AFIF vs. GBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 1.61% | 6.56% | 7.06% | 9.73% | -5.38% | -0.50% | 2.14% | 0.41% | -0.27% |
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 0.45% | 6.41% | 0.99% | 5.79% | -13.85% | -2.30% | 8.76% | 9.47% | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFIF and GBF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018 | 0.41 |
The correlation between AFIF and GBF shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFIF vs. GBF — Risk / Return Rank
AFIF
GBF
AFIF vs. GBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFIF | GBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.37 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 3.81 | +10.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFIF vs. GBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum GBF drawdown of -19.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and GBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFIF | GBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -19.67% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -2.73% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.79% | -5.78% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.85% | -18.45% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -4.62% | +4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -3.68% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.98% | -0.61% |
Volatility
AFIF vs. GBF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) is 0.36%, while iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF (GBF) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that AFIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFIF | GBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 1.07% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | 2.73% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 3.71% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 5.93% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 5.28% | +0.96% |
AFIF vs. GBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than GBF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFIF vs. GBF - Dividend Comparison
AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than GBF's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.73% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBF iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | 3.78% | 3.81% | 3.94% | 3.03% | 2.13% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 2.64% | 2.59% | 2.31% | 2.09% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFIF and GBF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBF has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to AFIF (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIF dropped -10.29% vs GBF's -19.67%.
On 5-year performance, AFIF leads with 3.68% vs -0.27% for GBF. On fees, GBF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AFIF has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFIF has performed better with a 3.68% return vs -0.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.
GBF has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 3.73% for AFIF.
AFIF is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while GBF is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for AFIF and 0.20% for GBF.
AFIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFIF and GBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer