QAI vs. MARB
QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and MARB (First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both Long-Short funds. QAI is passively managed, while MARB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QAI returned 4.45%/yr vs 2.96%/yr for MARB. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for MARB.
Performance
QAI vs. MARB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than MARB's 1.77% return.
QAI
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 15.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
MARB
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QAI vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 8.45% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.46% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.77% | 7.02% | 0.73% | 2.16% | 3.89% | 0.26% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and MARB is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2020 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QAI and MARB has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
MARB
QAI vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QAI | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 2.78 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 22.96 | -6.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QAI vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than MARB's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and MARB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -11.99% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | -2.43% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | -3.67% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | -3.67% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | 0.00% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -1.39% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.29% | +0.65% |
Volatility
QAI vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) at 1.06%. This indicates that QAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | MARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 1.06% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.63% | 2.35% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.58% | 5.35% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 4.28% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 5.59% | +0.64% |
QAI vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than MARB's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 2.96% | 3.01% | 2.11% | 2.20% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.39% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and MARB have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAI has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to MARB (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs MARB's -11.99%.
On 5-year performance, QAI leads with 4.45% vs 2.96% for MARB. On fees, QAI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, MARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QAI has performed better with a 4.45% return vs 2.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QAI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.
MARB has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.39% for QAI.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 2.30% for MARB.
QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAI and MARB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer