QAI vs. HSGFX
QAI (NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, QAI returned 3.74%/yr vs -2.10%/yr for HSGFX. Their -0.49 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for HSGFX.
Performance
QAI vs. HSGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than HSGFX's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, QAI has outperformed HSGFX with an annualized return of 3.74%, while HSGFX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.10% annualized return.
QAI
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 3.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.49%
HSGFX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- 6M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- -9.64%
- 3Y*
- -2.40%
- 5Y*
- -1.73%
- 10Y*
- -2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $2.04M | $2.05M | $2.17M |
QAI vs. HSGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 7.67% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 8.68% | -3.32% | 6.17% |
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | -4.39% | 6.24% | -6.99% | -11.60% | 17.33% | -0.23% | 14.52% | -18.87% | 8.78% | -12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and HSGFX is -0.68, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2009 | -0.49 |
The correlation between QAI and HSGFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (1 year) to -0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. HSGFX — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
HSGFX
QAI vs. HSGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QAI | HSGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.91 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | -0.47 | +3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.62 | -0.85 | +12.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QAI vs. HSGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum HSGFX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and HSGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | HSGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -60.61% | +45.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | -17.20% | +13.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | -24.52% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | -24.52% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | -30.86% | +15.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -54.46% | +52.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -27.03% | +24.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 9.41% | -8.33% |
Volatility
QAI vs. HSGFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) is 1.82%, while Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that QAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | HSGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 3.28% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 10.36% | -4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 12.86% | -6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 11.42% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 10.90% | -4.66% |
QAI vs. HSGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than HSGFX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. HSGFX - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than HSGFX's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund | 2.43% | 2.33% | 3.00% | 3.10% | 1.08% | 0.42% | 0.16% | 1.84% | 1.19% | 0.50% | 0.28% | 0.56% |
QAI NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.40% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and HSGFX have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSGFX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to QAI (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs HSGFX's -60.61%.
QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAI and HSGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer