HSGFX vs. FPACX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HSGFX (Hussman Strategic Growth Fund) and FPACX (FPA Crescent Fund) are both mutual funds - HSGFX is a Long-Short fund managed by Hussman Funds, while FPACX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by FPA. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX returned -3.11%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for FPACX. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. HSGFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FPACX.

Performance

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSGFX achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than FPACX's 5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, HSGFX has underperformed FPACX with an annualized return of -3.11%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.

HSGFX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -10.37%
• 6M: -11.70%
• 1Y: -18.33%
• 3Y*: -4.63%
• 5Y*: -3.66%
• 10Y*: -3.11%

FPACX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 5.71%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 17.84%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 10.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	-10.37%	6.24%	-6.99%	-11.60%	17.33%	-0.23%	14.52%	-18.87%	8.78%	-12.72%
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund	5.71%	17.69%	12.42%	20.30%	-9.20%	15.09%	12.14%	20.03%	-7.42%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HSGFX and FPACX is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2000	-0.39

The correlation between HSGFX and FPACX shifts across timeframes, from -0.57 (5 years) to -0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HSGFX vs. FPACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSGFX

HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 0
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

FPACX

FPACX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FPACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FPACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FPACX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FPACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FPACX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HSGFX	FPACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.47	1.96	-3.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.17	2.85	-5.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.37	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	2.40	-3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.94	9.05	-11.00

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSGFX Sharpe Ratio is -1.47, which is lower than the FPACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSGFX and FPACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than FPACX's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSGFX and FPACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSGFX	FPACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.61%	-31.60%	-29.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.21%	-7.37%	-10.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.37%	-10.95%	-13.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.37%	-18.47%	-5.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.41%	-29.46%	-3.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.30%	-0.78%	-56.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.91%	-3.87%	-23.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.26%	1.95%	+7.31%

Volatility

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison

Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) at 3.31%. This indicates that HSGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSGFX	FPACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	3.31%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	7.18%	+2.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.27%	9.03%	+3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.30%	11.93%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.83%	13.22%	-2.39%

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSGFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSGFX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison

HSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than FPACX's 9.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund	9.08%	9.60%	7.95%	3.72%	0.77%	11.62%	4.80%	4.65%	8.87%	3.70%	4.98%	6.34%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	2.60%	2.33%	3.00%	3.10%	1.08%	0.42%	0.16%	1.84%	1.19%	0.50%	0.28%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSGFX and FPACX in my portfolio?

HSGFX and FPACX have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HSGFX or FPACX?

HSGFX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FPACX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSGFX dropped -60.61% vs FPACX's -31.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.