QAI vs. CSHP
QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QAI is a Long-Short fund tracking the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. QAI is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, QAI returned 15.12% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
QAI vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAI achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.
QAI
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 15.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QAI vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 8.45% | 8.29% | 2.29% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAI and CSHP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.03 |
The correlation between QAI and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAI vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
QAI
CSHP
QAI vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QAI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 6.46 | -5.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 65.45 | -61.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 381.67 | -365.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QAI vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAI drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAI and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -0.08% | -14.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.71% | -0.06% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.04% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -0.00% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.01% | +0.93% |
Volatility
QAI vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that QAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAI | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 0.16% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.63% | 0.27% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.58% | 0.36% | +6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 0.41% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 0.41% | +5.82% |
QAI vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAI vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
QAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.39% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAI and CSHP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAI has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAI dropped -14.95% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, QAI leads with 15.12% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QAI has performed better with a 15.12% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.39% for QAI.
QAI is categorized as Long-Short, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QAI and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAI and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer