PZRMX vs. SCHP
PZRMX (PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both funds - PZRMX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by PIMCO, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). Over the past 10 years, PZRMX returned 7.33%/yr vs 2.68%/yr for SCHP. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZRMX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZRMX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PZRMX has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 7.33%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.
PZRMX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 17.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 7.08% | 16.18% | 12.47% | 5.95% | -5.42% | 13.22% | 8.92% | 10.42% | -4.05% | 7.96% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.76% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZRMX and SCHP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PZRMX and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZRMX vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
PZRMX
SCHP
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZRMX | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.07 | 1.58 | +1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.22 | 2.41 | +1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.28 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.42 | 2.55 | +2.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.29 | 7.78 | +14.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZRMX | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 1.58 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.20 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.48 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.51 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZRMX drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRMX and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZRMX | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -14.26% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -1.93% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | -4.48% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.57% | -14.26% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.18% | -14.26% | -3.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.10% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -3.94% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.63% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 0.91%. This indicates that PZRMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZRMX | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 0.91% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | 2.22% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 3.31% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.37% | 6.13% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 5.59% | +1.96% |
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZRMX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZRMX vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
PZRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than SCHP's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 2.19% | 2.35% | 9.84% | 0.00% | 13.86% | 11.20% | 0.54% | 2.56% | 11.15% | 6.06% | 0.16% | 2.73% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.98% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZRMX and SCHP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZRMX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to SCHP (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZRMX dropped -19.71% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
PZRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZRMX and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer