PZRMX vs. FPACX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX).
PZRMX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 31, 2001. FPACX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 1, 1993.
Performance
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 2.77% | 16.18% | 12.47% | 5.95% | -5.42% | 13.22% | 8.92% | 10.42% | -4.05% | 7.96% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | -3.27% | 17.69% | 12.42% | 20.30% | -9.20% | 15.09% | 12.14% | 20.03% | -7.42% | 10.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZRMX achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than FPACX's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PZRMX has underperformed FPACX with an annualized return of 7.17%, while FPACX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.
PZRMX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
FPACX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZRMX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FPACX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PZRMX vs. FPACX — Risk / Return Rank
PZRMX
FPACX
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZRMX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.27 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 1.84 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.27 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 1.71 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | 6.19 | +6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZRMX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.27 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.67 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.71 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.86 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PZRMX and FPACX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Dividend Comparison
PZRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FPACX's 9.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 2.29% | 2.35% | 9.84% | 0.00% | 13.86% | 11.20% | 0.54% | 2.56% | 11.15% | 6.06% | 0.16% | 2.73% |
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | 9.92% | 9.60% | 7.95% | 3.72% | 0.77% | 11.62% | 4.80% | 4.65% | 8.87% | 3.70% | 4.98% | 6.34% |
Drawdowns
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZRMX drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, smaller than the maximum FPACX drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRMX and FPACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZRMX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -31.60% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.96% | -7.37% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.57% | -18.47% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.18% | -29.46% | +11.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -7.19% | +4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -3.89% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.04% | -0.95% |
Volatility
PZRMX vs. FPACX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) is 2.33%, while FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that PZRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PZRMX | FPACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | 3.28% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 6.37% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 11.09% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 11.86% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.56% | 13.17% | -5.61% |