PZLV vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PZLV (Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. PZLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

PZLV vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PZLV

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 19.19%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZLV vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	12.17%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	0.00%

Return for Risk

PZLV vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 81
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZLV vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (PZLV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PZLV	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.63	0.95	+5.68

Drawdowns

PZLV vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZLV drawdown since its inception was -2.30%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZLV and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZLV	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-19.35%	+17.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-3.53%	+2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PZLV	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.20%	8.79%	+5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.20%	15.15%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.20%	15.29%	-1.09%

PZLV vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZLV vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

PZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%
PZLV Pzena U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PZLV or FUNL?

On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PZLV or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PZLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PZLV or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.00% for PZLV.

What is the main difference between PZLV and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Pzena and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PZLV and 0.50% for FUNL.